03.10 Auditing (Internal)

A) The working areas are identified? Is it guaranteed an adequate level of cleanliness?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) The work areas guarantee a correct and easy production flow, without improper accumulations of material?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Is there an appropriate areas where doing activities planned controls? (Ex ICP/aesthetic control)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Are reference samples correctly identified and available in all areas where necessary? (aree Produzione/ICP/Rework/GP12) (FGA 08094)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) There is a procedure for stock control according to FIFO method?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Has an updated list of the specific containers been defined? Is it available near the concerning Production Unit?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) All materials used in the process must be clearly identified and differentiated. Identification labels must be clearly visible on each container, with at least batch number, date, amount and code

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Has the containers packaging cards been filled? (dimensions of the containers, the material, the parts for container and any other information necessary) Have they been deliberated and suitable to protect the product conformity?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Is the M.d.R. planned quantity enough for the production volumes?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) Handling equipment guarantee the integrity of the product? (partners, lifters, rollers, rolling shutters)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Are the drawings available and updated according to the last ODM ?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) it is available and updated PFMEA and Process Flow Chart?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Are the STANDARDS concerning with the performed activities available? (e.g screw torque)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Workstations, control areas etc ... must have clear instructions for the operator, with respect to: set-up, changeover, approval First Piece, Mistake proofing, rework / repair activities with gauges, controls and packaging, according to the needs and methods of production

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Has the operation cards been validated and certificated?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) During production it filled a card that shows the trends of production? (stops, scrap etc.)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) There are Control Plan certificates with key features, nominal value, tolerances and references primary and secondary? The Control Plans are updated last ODM?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) There is matching in relation to key features including 3D program, Control Plan as numerosity, tolerances and nominal?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) The resources (gauges, measuring instruments and staff) are sufficient to perform all requirement of Control Plan?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) They made the repeatability tests on static and dynamic Control Equipments? (R & R <10% acceptable - R & R between 10% and 30% approved by the customer - R & R> 30% is not acceptable)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) All gauges,standard samples and test equipment must be calibrated in accordance with the instructions of the Group Tiberina. They also need to have the label with the date of last calibration and the expiration date.

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) The primary standards used for the calibration of gauges and measuring instruments must be properly identified and preserved.

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) There is a plan for the calibration? Calibration is performed according to the program?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

F) The control equipments not used must be stored in a suitable area. The elements must be cleaned, protected from damage and environmental influences, maintained accurately, and stored to ensure the functionality for the entire period of life

• Yes
• No
• N / A

G) Have Poka Yoke/Error Proof Systems been validated? Is their correct functionality verified by Trap Parts? is it documented the execution of the audit?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) The assembly equipment have been realized according to Customer method of the element (drawings, equipment)?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) modifications, tuning and set ups are recorded in a specific document (black book)?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) there are the certifications for the assembly equipments?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Tools and Equipments of Customer have to be identified according to the SCR (Specific Customer Requirements)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) The assembly equipments not used must be stored in a suitable area. The elements must be cleaned, protected from damage and environmental influences, maintained accurately, and stored to ensure the functionality for the entire period of life

• Yes
• No
• N / A

F) Has the scheduled preventive/periodical maintenance plan been developed?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

G) it is guaranteed the availability of spare parts for critical equipment or spare parts that require a long time for supply?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A ) Are the welding equipments available and functioning, as required by the Operation Card? they are in good condition?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Are the optimal parameters correct and showed as planned in the specific standard?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) There are mechanisms that guarantee the traceability of welding (when required )?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Has the scheduled preventive/periodical maintenance plan been developed?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) it is defined a frequency for parameterization of welding tongs SDP / SDPR? Ammeter and dynamometer are working and in good condition?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

F) it is guaranteed the availability of spare parts for critical equipment or spare parts that require a long time for supply?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) The non-conforming material is properly identified and segregated? Scrap - Repair - NC Parts. It's respected the maximum time allowed for scrapping?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B*) Are Internal Quality Indicators correctly managed? Does Defects Pareto diagrams exist for each Part Number?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Do the defectivenes of welding spots, SDEL joint, laser weld agree with what is required by the specific standards?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Does SDPR process guarantee product conformity ?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) When exceeding the limit of acceptability (of the specific control chart applied) are implemented specific action (block shipping containers - check process)?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Are production parts approved by Customer?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Are Incoming parts approved by the Plant?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) the expiration date of products such as sealants, adhesives, thermo-expandable are conforming?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Suppliers deliver the CQC? The datas of Cp-Cpk are as required in the Control Plan?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) Do the suppliers deliver the CQC as required by the standard 9.01103? in case of non-conformity actions are open to supplier ?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Are 3D Program Control plans consistent?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Measurement frequencies planned have been complied?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Capability of dimensional characteristics complies with Customer Requests? (FCA 25100/00: Cp,Cpk ≥ 1,67 for CF1D; ≥1,33 for all the rest)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) When there are Cp / Cpk out objective, specific countermeasures are implemented?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Are the controls performed as indicated in the Control Plans, for methods and frequencies?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) The "first piece product" is in production line, shows the date, time and performer of control? The pieces tested after the approval of production start-up must be present (minimum the last checked, showing dd hh and signature).

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) The customer claims are properly managed with investigation of the causes and implementation of appropriate corrective actions?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) There is a procedure / instruction that defines how the recovery / reworked of components? Are made specific control (approved by quality) for the deliberation of the reworked products or for the deliberation of components to be reworked ?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

F) There is a plan for requalification the product / process / equipment as required by the standards? It is respected? The requalification is fully and exhaustive?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Are there specific dossier for each part number, for each productive process, containing the main technological documents and registrations?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Is there in the Production Unit an updated list of ODM, detailing the introduced modifications?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Is the respondency of CQC (delivered together with the supplies lots) tested, by comparison with the respondency indicated on the ODM list?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D*) Does FIFO guarantee the enslavement to production of last ODM and last exponent of adjustement?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) Does the supplier give all the informations about report carachteristics' check?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Are parts properly marked in accordance to the traceability? (when required)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) Is REPORT documentation properly identified? With specific symbol

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Are the documents stored according to procedure? REPORT 15 years OTHERS 2 years (Standard FIAT 9.01102)

• Yes
• No
• N / A

A) It 's been done' training for maintenance?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

B) Are production and check people correctly trained? Welders are qualificated?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

C) It was done the training for the operators involved in non-destructive testing? (UT, PT) The laboratory staff are sufficiently trained?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

D) Are there the aptitudinal SKILL for all people involved in reworks?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

E) Is versatility of skilled people correctly managed to guarantee all shifts coverage?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

F) For the points A) B) and C), it was verified the efficacy of the training?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

G) There are attitudinal skills of the resources used in the production process?

• Yes
• No
• N / A

Were NCs found that require an action plan?

• Pass
• Flag
• Fail